Less than 3 hours - Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge

kayakhunter · 11-04-2009, 09:25 AM

Email sent.

Sherm · 11-04-2009, 09:43 AM

I sent a bunch a couple days ago. When are the lawyers going to get involved and stop this?

tylerdurden · 11-04-2009, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sherm

I sent a bunch a couple days ago. When are the lawyers going to get involved and stop this?

Not likely. Hasn't happened in any of the other regions that are finished. I know we had more people and more of a fight here, but why would we be any different than the other regions? Even though we put up more of a fight/got more involved than the other regions, I just don't see who is going to put up the money for lawyers to deal with this.

Just my take.

JoeBeck · 11-04-2009, 09:59 AM

Maybe a fundraiser? or maybe some lawyers on here can weigh in I'm sure some of them fish. What gets me is the meetings I went to it was very clear that the majority supported Map 2 and Map 2 made the most sense for both conservation and limiting economic impact. It just makes most sense all around. I know it is not over but it really surprised me watching how they reconstructed the 3 maps.

Obviously I'm preaching to the choir but complete closures are not the solution for conservation, you are taking the people out of the environment who interact with it and care for it the most.

That said, I sent more emails.

tylerdurden · 11-04-2009, 10:38 AM

Joe, I think it would take way more money than just a couple simple fundraisers.

I was a little surprised that the BRTF ground the maps up publicly. That was actually nice to see it happen instead of hidden in some back room somewhere.

I also liked that they did listen to our RSG members some and gave them one last shot at changing their minds. They didn't liste enough, but it was better than I thought it would go.

That said this whole thing is beyond FUBAR.

Quilted Germ · 11-04-2009, 01:29 PM

I just hope our emails and letters pursuade the feable minded just enough to keep us on and in the water.....

Matt · 11-04-2009, 03:31 PM

FUBARATS(F@#ked up beyond all recognition and then some)

11-04-2009, 09:25 AM	#1
kayakhunter Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Orange Posts: 207	Thank you for all the hard work..... Email sent.

11-04-2009, 10:38 AM	#5
tylerdurden Bad Clone Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 874	Joe, I think it would take way more money than just a couple simple fundraisers. I was a little surprised that the BRTF ground the maps up publicly. That was actually nice to see it happen instead of hidden in some back room somewhere. I also liked that they did listen to our RSG members some and gave them one last shot at changing their minds. They didn't liste enough, but it was better than I thought it would go. That said this whole thing is beyond FUBAR. __________________ MLPA, if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem Let the Fish and Game Commission know what you think about the proposed maps. Be ready for December 9th and 10th.

11-04-2009, 01:29 PM	#6
Quilted Germ Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Cardiff, Ca Posts: 185	I just hope our emails and letters pursuade the feable minded just enough to keep us on and in the water..... __________________ Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first. - Ronald Reagan

11-04-2009, 03:31 PM	#7
Matt Support your local pangas Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Lj Posts: 976	FUBARATS(F@#ked up beyond all recognition and then some) __________________ Thanks Matt F.

11-04-2009, 09:43 AM	#2
Sherm Senior Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: San Diego Posts: 490	I sent a bunch a couple days ago. When are the lawyers going to get involved and stop this?

11-04-2009, 09:59 AM	#4
JoeBeck Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: San Diego Posts: 370	Maybe a fundraiser? or maybe some lawyers on here can weigh in I'm sure some of them fish. What gets me is the meetings I went to it was very clear that the majority supported Map 2 and Map 2 made the most sense for both conservation and limiting economic impact. It just makes most sense all around. I know it is not over but it really surprised me watching how they reconstructed the 3 maps. Obviously I'm preaching to the choir but complete closures are not the solution for conservation, you are taking the people out of the environment who interact with it and care for it the most. That said, I sent more emails.