Quote:
Originally Posted by B Slate
Is it just me or should they be put in polluted areas too. They can't put one in a polluted area, so they are going to try to take the cleanest and best waters of our coastline. Therefore leaving all of the polluted areas for us to fish in. I don't get this. Shoudn't they put them in the polluted and less fishy areas, so they can see if it actually helps improve them.  |
STOP MAKING SENSE
My question for every enviro was the same - since the fish are already in peril if the area is polluted - shouldn't they receive the benefit of a closure? Not one had an answer, they all agreed, even a seal lady listening in. Yet the N. PV closure (for instance) continues while the polluted south is free to fish...oh, wait, look up on the cliffs and then go to Zillow to get approximate home values and you'll find your real answer.
07-02-2009, 02:10 PM
Threaded Mode