|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
03-18-2018, 01:01 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 754
|
Thanks to everyone who has responded. I agree with Flounder, enough's enough. I recently attended a meeting in Sacramento, where the goal was to increase fishing license sales. It was hard to come up with any good solutions given all the barriers. A lead ban would be one more. I suppose I could see the point if it were proven to impact wildlife, but there are no studies that do so.
|
03-18-2018, 01:18 PM | #2 |
Sea Hunter
|
The only way you'll get my lead.....
Is to pry it from my cold dead hand
__________________
Duke Mitchell |
03-18-2018, 05:10 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 163
|
Done
|
03-18-2018, 05:25 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 265
|
Done !
|
03-18-2018, 06:41 PM | #5 |
Junior
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 10
|
Crap, the list of things I've got to go across state lines for is is getting longer and longer:
1. Bullets 2. Plastic bags 3. incandescent light bulbs 4. Fishing weights 5. ? |
03-19-2018, 04:29 AM | #6 |
Sea Hunter
|
.5?
Condoms.
It's better to have it, and not need it. Then to need it and not have it.
__________________
Duke Mitchell |
03-19-2018, 06:38 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 861
|
Disclaimer: I signed the petition.
Do any of you really trust research on a topic like this, when the groups funding the research have financial reasons to hope for a specific outcome? I sure don't. Maybe we need to start taking a look at other, more ecologically friendly options for our sport. If we want to see recreational fishing exist in another 100 years, we are going to need to change with the times and evolve as well... |
|
|