|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
01-17-2019, 08:30 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Carlsbad
Posts: 388
|
Here's a couple for you guys. Lowrance elite 7 chirp. All surface, noise clarity etc... turned off. Sensitivity 63% colorline 78% ... I found it marks pretty good and i can decipher what type of fish is under the boat but I'm thinking of switching to medium chirp or 200hz vs. 83hz so I have a better understanding of what is directly under me. Thoughts?
IMG_3009.jpg IMG_3380.jpg IMG_3881.jpg
__________________
|
01-18-2019, 06:04 AM | #2 | |
Brandon
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,345
|
Quote:
Judging by the pictures in your graph I wouldn’t change many settings. Those are some great images |
|
01-18-2019, 05:06 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,384
|
Quote:
The high frequency is better at indicating what you are looking at (based on the colors), assuming that both your sensitivity and colorline are not too high nor too low. If all of the targets (including bait schools) return the hardest color of your chosen pallet, then you are probably too high in one or both (in either frequency type). But, in my experience, the high frequency can be better fine tuned to return color differences between species. As with all other marks, the size of (and distance to) the target are going to play a part in what you see on the screen for any particular settings. |
|
|
|