MLPA meeting highlights / lowlights in real time - Page 3 - Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge

tylerdurden · 10-22-2009, 03:12 PM

I was wondering what happened. Time to grab a beer and mourn the losses.

edit->
Feed is back up, but it says they are still on a short break.

bender0240 · 10-22-2009, 03:18 PM

Paul Lebowitz Got the word on the B option SMCA. "Recreational coastal pelagics by hook and line only." Sorry my amphibious friends, there's no joy for you. And I fear our YT spot is done. Someone please double check the MLPA definition of coastal pelagics.

tylerdurden · 10-22-2009, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bender0240

Paul Lebowitz Got the word on the B option SMCA. "Recreational coastal pelagics by hook and line only." Sorry my amphibious friends, there's no joy for you. And I fear our YT spot is done. Someone please double check the MLPA definition of coastal pelagics.

Coastal pelagics mean bait only.

pelagic means yt, wsb, and t sharks.

:the _finger:

JoeBeck · 10-22-2009, 03:29 PM

They are starting back up

tylerdurden · 10-22-2009, 03:29 PM

Feed is back up and they are running.

PAL · 10-22-2009, 03:32 PM

Greg: Rocky Pt is looking pretty good. It'll be either an SMR farther down on the west face, or another one slightly north that gets the bottom 1/4 or so of RP. Cat West End is safe.

I'm going back to my Facebook feed. Please keep reposting the major stuff over here for me.

Billy V · 10-22-2009, 03:37 PM

Did I just hear that correctly 3 Potential Options for La Jolla for Further Discussion ?

The Smca @ Scripps & S. La Jolla
or
Map 2 Proposal as is
or
Swamis & Point Loma.............and All meet the SAT.
------------------------------------------
So defer to the Economic Impact to PCFV and Recreation Fishing and The Local Businesses you fken dummies.

The Live Feed keeps cutting out. This is a nightmare.

JoeBeck · 10-22-2009, 03:42 PM

I keep losing the feed. They need to improve there

technology

Billy V · 10-22-2009, 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeBeck

I keep losing the feed. They need to improve there

technology

Kill Them, Kill Them Now!

Grego · 10-22-2009, 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAL

Greg: Rocky Pt is looking pretty good. It'll be either an SMR farther down on the west face, or another one slightly north that gets the bottom 1/4 or so of RP. Cat West End is safe.

I'm going back to my Facebook feed. Please keep reposting the major stuff over here for me.

Yeah..Rocky Point!

Billy V · 10-22-2009, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grego

Yeah..Rocky Point!

You earned it my friend.

Gino · 10-22-2009, 04:05 PM

talking about Laguna now

Billy V · 10-22-2009, 04:18 PM

How can I access Paul's Facebook if I am not a Facebook Member ?

Is there a way ?

JoeBeck · 10-22-2009, 04:21 PM

No, I had to become a member. Don't plan on using it after this.

PAL · 10-22-2009, 04:22 PM

Still fighting over the OC wedge. It does a number on free divers. the boundaries are impossible to figure out from the water unless you have it mapped on your GPS. Overall kayak fishing out of Newport and Dana are looking good. There's nothing at Doheny or the headlands. the SMCAs allow all finfish. The issue is the entire span of Laguna north of the Aliso outfall.

JoeBeck · 10-22-2009, 04:30 PM

Damn guidelines, they keep coming up. They did not listen to the people about the social economic impact. A shame for California.

"It does not restrict access it just means these people will not be able to fish"

Gino · 10-22-2009, 04:33 PM

I wont spend a dime of money in Laguna ever again. regardless of the outcome, they city council there obviously doesnt welcome buisness.

theres a reason why thier is no fishign /tackle stores in Laguna, the City wont give you the permit. bunch of fruitcakes

tylerdurden · 10-22-2009, 04:33 PM

Meg Caldwell just doesn't get it on the access issue. We need fishing/spearing only areas with no surfing, scuba, or swimming. Then the other side will know how we feel.

B Slate · 10-22-2009, 04:43 PM

How can anyone say any reserve does not restict access. Yet they said it multiple times

MVC · 10-22-2009, 04:51 PM

I would feel good about the whole system if those people from Laguna would get hosed. I can't believe that they would propose to close their entire coast. Alot of compromise there.

10-22-2009, 03:12 PM	#41
tylerdurden Bad Clone Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 874	I was wondering what happened. Time to grab a beer and mourn the losses. edit-> Feed is back up, but it says they are still on a short break. __________________ MLPA, if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem Let the Fish and Game Commission know what you think about the proposed maps. Be ready for December 9th and 10th.

10-22-2009, 03:29 PM	#45
tylerdurden Bad Clone Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 874	Feed is back up and they are running. __________________ MLPA, if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem Let the Fish and Game Commission know what you think about the proposed maps. Be ready for December 9th and 10th.

10-22-2009, 03:37 PM	#47
Billy V Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Bay Ho Posts: 1,382	Did I just hear that correctly 3 Potential Options for La Jolla for Further Discussion ? The Smca @ Scripps & S. La Jolla or Map 2 Proposal as is or Swamis & Point Loma.............and All meet the SAT. ------------------------------------------ So defer to the Economic Impact to PCFV and Recreation Fishing and The Local Businesses you fken dummies. The Live Feed keeps cutting out. This is a nightmare. Last edited by Billy V; 10-22-2009 at 04:10 PM.

10-22-2009, 04:33 PM	#58
tylerdurden Bad Clone Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 874	Meg Caldwell just doesn't get it on the access issue. We need fishing/spearing only areas with no surfing, scuba, or swimming. Then the other side will know how we feel. __________________ MLPA, if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem Let the Fish and Game Commission know what you think about the proposed maps. Be ready for December 9th and 10th. Last edited by tylerdurden; 10-23-2009 at 07:36 AM.

10-22-2009, 03:18 PM	#42
bender0240 Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 118	Paul Lebowitz Got the word on the B option SMCA. "Recreational coastal pelagics by hook and line only." Sorry my amphibious friends, there's no joy for you. And I fear our YT spot is done. Someone please double check the MLPA definition of coastal pelagics.

10-22-2009, 03:29 PM	#44
JoeBeck Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: San Diego Posts: 370	They are starting back up

10-22-2009, 03:32 PM	#46
PAL Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 754	Greg: Rocky Pt is looking pretty good. It'll be either an SMR farther down on the west face, or another one slightly north that gets the bottom 1/4 or so of RP. Cat West End is safe. I'm going back to my Facebook feed. Please keep reposting the major stuff over here for me.

10-22-2009, 03:42 PM	#48
JoeBeck Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: San Diego Posts: 370	I keep losing the feed. They need to improve there technology

10-22-2009, 04:05 PM	#52
Gino Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 520	talking about Laguna now

10-22-2009, 04:18 PM	#53
Billy V Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Bay Ho Posts: 1,382	How can I access Paul's Facebook if I am not a Facebook Member ? Is there a way ?

10-22-2009, 04:21 PM	#54
JoeBeck Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: San Diego Posts: 370	No, I had to become a member. Don't plan on using it after this.

10-22-2009, 04:22 PM	#55
PAL Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 754	Still fighting over the OC wedge. It does a number on free divers. the boundaries are impossible to figure out from the water unless you have it mapped on your GPS. Overall kayak fishing out of Newport and Dana are looking good. There's nothing at Doheny or the headlands. the SMCAs allow all finfish. The issue is the entire span of Laguna north of the Aliso outfall.

10-22-2009, 04:30 PM	#56
JoeBeck Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: San Diego Posts: 370	Damn guidelines, they keep coming up. They did not listen to the people about the social economic impact. A shame for California. "It does not restrict access it just means these people will not be able to fish"

10-22-2009, 04:43 PM	#59
B Slate Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: La Verne Posts: 92	How can anyone say any reserve does not restict access. Yet they said it multiple times

10-22-2009, 04:51 PM	#60
MVC Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Costa Mesa Posts: 278	I would feel good about the whole system if those people from Laguna would get hosed. I can't believe that they would propose to close their entire coast. Alot of compromise there.