Fishing rods - Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge

dorado50 · 01-24-2011, 09:40 AM

or fishing poles? Which do you prefer and why...

j mo · 01-24-2011, 09:48 AM

I prefer to call them fishing "staffs" as it sounds more wizardly ....

Vikingj · 01-24-2011, 10:33 AM

Manually operated nekton retrieval boom?

MrPatrick · 01-24-2011, 10:43 AM

I used To call them rods because my dad called them poles. We all are semi-jerks when teens. Just had to be a contrarian. Now I use either. He has been gone 7 months now I would give almost anything to learn one more thing from him.

Podaker · 01-24-2011, 11:36 AM

Rods or Poles! (that's what she said)!!

Siebler · 01-24-2011, 11:56 AM

Definitely Rods.

Jimmyz123 · 01-24-2011, 05:21 PM

Rods, it's just what I have called them the most. Sometimes I'll say poles though, it's not a true science.

deepdvr · 01-24-2011, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dorado50

or fishing poles? Which do you prefer and why...

Dave...did some 12 year old kid hack into your BWE account???

Fiskadoro · 01-25-2011, 07:26 PM

Rods or fishing poles?

In the old days everything was a pole, but when I was a kid fishing in Texas you heard both. The general rule was glass blanks were rods, cane poles for crappie fishing, snook poles and surf rods built from Calcutta were called poles.

Cane poles were light weight cane used for bank fishing.

Snook poles were made from a plantation grown high density bamboo that came from I think the Yucatan. I don't know why but everyone called them Calcutta poles.

For snook you'd rig a short piece of wire to a jig or lure which you'd the drop "Doodlesock" around bridge and pier pilings at night.

No reels with that rig, you'd hook the fish and bounce them up on the pier.

Back in the day it was very hard to find a heavy blank over ten feet long that wasn't extremely expensive so we took big twelve an fourteen foot Calcutta poles and wrapped surf poles with guides reel seats "varmacs" and twine for grips. I could not find a picture of one but it was old school.

When Fenwick and Harnell came out with more big blanks the price dropped and everyone eventually went to glass, but I still remember back in 1973 when I had both: two twelve foot Calcutta's and a 542 Harnell.

They were the first big rods I wrapped, and I took them by the baitshop in Corpus where I got the bamboo. The owner looked them all over and said nice poles, but that is one hell of a nice rod. Like I said bamboo were poles while Harnells and Fenwicks were rods.

I eventually broke the two poles on fish as they would fatigue over time, one on a bull red and the other on a blacktip, but still have that Harnell...

.....just snapped that pic, still with the original grips and reel seat 37 years later.

Damned if I know what to use it for these days, but I still like the thing anyway.

So that's my take. Bamboo poles, Glass, Graphite, composites, rods

Jim

dorado50 · 01-25-2011, 07:39 PM

Right on! My dad still to this day says he "don't need no bait,just spit on the hook". I have'nt tried his method yet!

Amish Ed · 01-25-2011, 08:10 PM

As a deckhand I was taught that poles are for freshwater and rods for salt. Me I like rod.

CalicoCody · 01-27-2011, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amish Ed

As a deckhand I was taught that poles are for freshwater and rods for salt. Me I like rod.

That's a good way to put it.

... but as for me, ROD it is.

wiredantz · 01-27-2011, 08:44 PM

Under a hundred equals fishing POLE. Over a hundred equals fishing ROD.

01-24-2011, 09:40 AM	#1
dorado50 Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: La Jolla Shores Posts: 1,626	Fishing rods or fishing poles? Which do you prefer and why...

01-24-2011, 10:43 AM	#4
MrPatrick Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Waiting to launch Posts: 1,381	Rod I used To call them rods because my dad called them poles. We all are semi-jerks when teens. Just had to be a contrarian. Now I use either. He has been gone 7 months now I would give almost anything to learn one more thing from him.

01-24-2011, 11:56 AM	#6
Siebler Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Richland Oregon Posts: 1,547	Definitely Rods. __________________ CJ Siebler

01-25-2011, 08:10 PM	#11
Amish Ed Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Grants Pass, OR Posts: 1,903	As a deckhand I was taught that poles are for freshwater and rods for salt. Me I like rod. __________________ Amish Ed You can't catch it again if it's dead!

01-24-2011, 09:48 AM	#2
j mo Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Encinitas Posts: 600	I prefer to call them fishing "staffs" as it sounds more wizardly ....

01-24-2011, 10:33 AM	#3
Vikingj Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Dana Point area Posts: 438	Manually operated nekton retrieval boom?

01-24-2011, 11:36 AM	#5
Podaker Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: la jolla shores Posts: 86	Rods or Poles! (that's what she said)!!

01-24-2011, 05:21 PM	#7
Jimmyz123 Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: San Diego Posts: 2,385	Rods, it's just what I have called them the most. Sometimes I'll say poles though, it's not a true science.

01-25-2011, 07:26 PM	#9
Fiskadoro ....... Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,509	Rods or fishing poles? In the old days everything was a pole, but when I was a kid fishing in Texas you heard both. The general rule was glass blanks were rods, cane poles for crappie fishing, snook poles and surf rods built from Calcutta were called poles. Cane poles were light weight cane used for bank fishing. Snook poles were made from a plantation grown high density bamboo that came from I think the Yucatan. I don't know why but everyone called them Calcutta poles. For snook you'd rig a short piece of wire to a jig or lure which you'd the drop "Doodlesock" around bridge and pier pilings at night. No reels with that rig, you'd hook the fish and bounce them up on the pier. Back in the day it was very hard to find a heavy blank over ten feet long that wasn't extremely expensive so we took big twelve an fourteen foot Calcutta poles and wrapped surf poles with guides reel seats "varmacs" and twine for grips. I could not find a picture of one but it was old school. When Fenwick and Harnell came out with more big blanks the price dropped and everyone eventually went to glass, but I still remember back in 1973 when I had both: two twelve foot Calcutta's and a 542 Harnell. They were the first big rods I wrapped, and I took them by the baitshop in Corpus where I got the bamboo. The owner looked them all over and said nice poles, but that is one hell of a nice rod. Like I said bamboo were poles while Harnells and Fenwicks were rods. I eventually broke the two poles on fish as they would fatigue over time, one on a bull red and the other on a blacktip, but still have that Harnell... .....just snapped that pic, still with the original grips and reel seat 37 years later. Damned if I know what to use it for these days, but I still like the thing anyway. So that's my take. Bamboo poles, Glass, Graphite, composites, rods Jim

01-25-2011, 07:39 PM	#10
dorado50 Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: La Jolla Shores Posts: 1,626	Right on! My dad still to this day says he "don't need no bait,just spit on the hook". I have'nt tried his method yet!

01-27-2011, 08:44 PM	#13
wiredantz Currently @ MLO Territory Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Under the Shadow Posts: 2,290	Under a hundred equals fishing POLE. Over a hundred equals fishing ROD.