Quote:
Originally Posted by Holy Mackerel
It was good to talk with a lot of people, and see the show! In the end, C was not moved fwd, but doctrine from it may have life, thanks to scrambling the BRTF.
|
C was doomed by it's lack of compromise, it's lack of convergence of ideas from all sides.
The whole duplication argument is BS. For fisherman every mark on the map has meaning there are no duplicates.
This is not Northern California, there is only so much rocky bottom you can close without undo hardship. So as the plans go forward they will look even more alike over time until there is only one plan. The plans that went forward in this round are similar because they do reflect the hard work and meeting of the minds, the convergence the BRTF has demanded in the RSG groups.
I know that I for one am grateful for all the hard work on this put in by our reps on the RSG.
That hard work may be lost on Meg Caldwell but it's not lost on others and I'd say not and even on the other members of the BRTF.
No-one seconded Meg's initial amendment proposal to push C forward, she put herself out on a limb and lost the support of the rest of the BRTF that is a victory in itself even if she did get in a lesser amendment to keep some of C's ideas in possible play.
All the fishing oriented RSG members should feel proud. They helped expose who's willing to work in a spirit of convergence within the guidelines and who is just pushing a pre-ordained agenda.
Enjoy the victory. It may be a small one but it's one step towards the larger goal, a final solution that we can live with. That said they know what they are up against and are only going to come back at us harder.
Thanks for all the hard work!!
Jim