03-13-2014, 05:06 AM
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Menifee
Posts: 2,509
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregAndrew
Idk, I am no lawyer, but it seems to me that they may have a case. The sign has been there for 90 years with multiple owners that were not required to tear it down. That sounds like selective enforcement to me. Hell, the sign may pre-exist the law and be grandfathered in somehow. Also, there is no mention in the citation on how to make the sign conforming, which it states can rectify the situation? And 3 days to appeal a sign that has been there for 90 years, really?
|
^^^^This
__________________
”The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.”
~Thomas Jefferson.........maybe 
|
|
|