View Single Post
Old 02-01-2021, 07:53 PM   #10
GregB
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Santa Monica Bay
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by FullFlavorPike View Post
Per the regs, "(a) The 100-fm (183-m) depth contour used between the U.S. border with Canada and the U.S. border with Mexico is defined by straight lines connecting all of the following points in the order stated. . . ."

If the CFR define the "100 fathom line" by a series of waypoints, then the waypoints should control over the description by metes and bounds, i.e. calling it the "100 fathom depth contour." My informed guess is they drew the line accordingly becuase the bathymetry is not exactly consistent, and trenches or seamounts on one side of the line or the other could make for enforcement hurdles. I could see an interesting case come up where somebody gets tagged by law enforcement for fishing in deeper water, but which water is not seaward of the 100fm line. You'd basically have to have enforcement misunderstanding the regs or something, which is unfortunately more common than it should be. I'd probably bet on a court (or more likely an ALJ) ruling in favor of the fisherman there because of how the regs are written.

On the contrapositive, fishing on the wrong side of the waypoints violates the regs regardless of water depth. That seems counterintuitive to some, but it's how the reg was promulgated. Thus if the line passes through an area where depth is 500' or so, you could still get tagged for fishing in sub-100fn waters because of how the waypoints are drawn.

I'd also be interested in the application of the rules to a fisherman unable to comply because of a lack of GPS, either permanent or temporary. I'm uncertain how that one would shake out.
Yeah; haven't heard back from DFG yet, but I agree that any adjudicator probably will side with a fisher who is inside the boundary, regardless of actual depth. Of course that doesn't mean enforcement will be uniform but that's what the court is for. The system generally works, and the hassle factor of making it work is a minor price to pay for BIG CHUNKY REDS caught legally.

Oh - and a reminder to all the SoCal fishing bretheren and sisteren—using descenders for the babies makes for more and bigger fish tacos on the out years!
GregB is offline   Reply With Quote